XAnalytics · Backtest audit File @MarkSterling0 · 12 Jun 2026

@MarkSterling0 · 88 verified calls backtested

Inconclusive

@MarkSterling0's calls have beaten their sector by 0.0% per month, winning 0% of the time.

+0.0%
Avg. return vs its sector
per call · over the timeframe it called (or 1 month)
-1.4%
1 day
1 month
3 months
the same calls held a fixed 1 day / 1 month / 3 months
0%
Calls that beat the market
based on 1 deduplicated bets
0% beat their sector 100% didn't

Too few price-backed calls to draw a conclusion yet.

What “return vs sector” means
Each call's stock vs its own sector — beating the sector, not just going up, is the fair test of skill. Averaged across 1 deduplicated bets. Calls that named their own timeframe are judged over that window (as a per-month rate); the rest over 1 month.

Performance over time

Aftervs sectorvs S&P 500Hit rateCalls
1 day -1.4% -1.3% 32% 40

“vs sector” compares each call to the stock's own industry — the fairest test of skill.

What drives the signal

Does conviction matter?

Return by post type

Long vs short

Step behind the counter — every call, every chart, every time horizon. Filter by conviction or direction and chart any single trade.

Open the data room →
THE RECEIPTS
@MarkSterling0 · audited 12 Jun 2026

calls found88
independent bets1
beat the market0%
avg edge / month+0.0%

VERDICT: INCONCLUSIVE
SCORE 1/10

getxanalysis.net · run the receipts on anyone
Share the receipts on X ↗ Download all calls (CSV) ↓

Help shape XAnalytics

Was this report useful?

How we measured this · download the raw data

We pull @MarkSterling0's posts, use AI to extract each call (ticker, direction, conviction), and backtest it against real prices. A call wins only if it beat its own sector over the month after — not just if the stock rose. Headline numbers use deduplicated bets.

Download the full backtest data (JSONL)

Backtested results are computed from historical price data and do not predict future performance. Every signal here is extracted automatically from public posts and may misread intent, sarcasm, or context. This is not investment advice — verify everything independently before acting on it.