The gallery

Every account is scored the same way — on the strength of the evidence, not on a single lucky call.

1. Each call becomes a bet. We turn an account's posts into individual bets and measure how much each one beat, or trailed, the stock's own sector — a fairer test than “did the stock go up,” since the whole market tends to rise and fall together.

2. We rank by how convincing the edge is. That combines how large the average market-beating return is, how consistent it is, and how many independent bets stand behind it — into a single measure of confidence that the edge is real. A modest edge proven over hundreds of calls outranks two spectacular ones.

3. Rank and score answer different questions. The rank (Nº) is how sure we are an edge is real; the score (1–10) is how worth following it is — how much it beats the market, tempered by that certainty. So a heavily-posted account can rank high on certainty yet score modestly (a real but small edge). Open any account for its full verdict and the numbers behind it.

4. We don't double-count, and we don't reward luck. Calls on the same sector in the same week largely ride the same move, so they count as fewer truly independent bets — and an edge carried by one or two outsized winners is discounted, because that's fragile, not repeatable.

Accounts with fewer than 30 bets aren't ranked yet — too little to judge. The top of the board is simply the strongest, best-evidenced edge.