XAnalytics · Backtest audit File @DudeWhoInvests · 1 Jul 2026

@DudeWhoInvests · 1156 verified calls backtested

Inconclusive

@DudeWhoInvests's calls have trailed their sector by 0.3% per month, winning 47% of the time.

-0.3%
Avg. return vs its sector
per call · over the timeframe it called (or 1 month)
-0.2%
1 day
-0.1%
1 month
-2.4%
3 months
the same calls held a fixed 1 day / 1 month / 3 months
47%
Calls that beat the market
based on 443 deduplicated bets
47% beat their sector 53% didn't

The signal is indistinguishable from noise.

What “return vs sector” means
Each call's stock vs its own sector — beating the sector, not just going up, is the fair test of skill. Averaged across 443 deduplicated bets. Calls that named their own timeframe are judged over that window (as a per-month rate); the rest over 1 month.
Indistinguishable from luck

Across 443 bets, @DudeWhoInvests's average call trailed its sector by 0.3% per month, each bet judged on its author's own timeframe (1 month when unstated, or as far into it as the data reaches) — t = -0.4, not enough to tell skill from chance.

could be luckt = 2almost certain

t = -0.4 — the strength of the evidence. Above 2, there's under a 5% chance it's luck.

How the t-value works

Each call is one bet, scored by how much it beat its own sector (fairer than the whole market). The t-value is the average beat divided by its uncertainty:

t = x̄ ⁄ ( s ⁄ √M ) x̄ = avg beat · s = how much the bets vary · M = number of bets

Same-week, same-sector calls ride one move, so they prove less than fully independent wins — the 443 bets count as 336 effective ones. That's why the honest t is -0.4, not the raw -0.5. Full breakdown on the analysis page.

Performance over time

Aftervs sectorvs S&P 500Hit rateCalls
1 day -0.2% -0.3% 45% 478
1 month -0.1% -0.1% 48% 438
3 months -2.4% -1.5% 38% 390
6 months -5.4% -3.7% 37% 300

“vs sector” compares each call to the stock's own industry — the fairest test of skill.

What drives the signal

Does conviction matter?

High conviction830 calls · 67% hit
+3.9%
Low conviction246 calls · 45% hit
-0.9%

Return by post type

Analysis366 calls · 65% hit
+3.5%
Position Disclosure93 calls · 62% hit
+3.5%
Prediction457 calls · 60% hit
+2.5%
News Reaction147 calls · 61% hit
+1.9%

Long vs short

Long1045 calls · 63% hit
+2.9%
Short31 calls · 35% hit
-0.5%

The evidence — best & worst calls

Biggest wins (after 1 month)

Exhibit A · 2025-07-16 ETH-USD
“Ether $ETH”
Long · high conviction · View on X ↗
Full post
Are we serious right now?? This is absolutely horrible and we no longer have an independent Federal Reserve. I will tell you, this is EXTREMELY FREAKING bullish any & all crypto especially Bitcoin $BTC, Ether $ETH, Solana $SOL, etc. Crazy we have come to this point. Smh. https://t.co/uUcZFkUko0
+31.6%vs sector
Exhibit B · 2025-07-18 BMNR
“INSIDERS ONLY BUY FOR ONE REASON FELLAS, THEY THINK THE PRICE WILL RISE!”
Long · high conviction · View on X ↗
Full post
TOM LEE BOUGHT MORE BITMINE IMMERSION TECH $BMNR HIS NEW ETHEREUM TREASURY WHICH PETER THIEL ALSO OWNS... INSIDERS ONLY BUY FOR ONE REASON FELLAS, THEY THINK THE PRICE WILL RISE! 👀 https://t.co/Tpv1jvtF7u --- @BourbonInsider @fundstrat buying 👀
+29.6%vs sector
Exhibit C · 2025-10-27 GOOGL
“Google $GOOGL to $300/share is coming way sooner than we all think!!!”
Long · high conviction · View on X ↗
Full post
Google $GOOGL to $300/share is coming way sooner than we all think!!! 🤩 https://t.co/Sh5CAlQ6J6
+22.6%vs sector

Biggest misses (after 1 month)

Exhibit D · 2025-07-31 FIG
“I already know this thing is ripping crazy once trading opens up the demand is probably ridiculous”
Long · low conviction · View on X ↗
Full post
Figma $FIG IPO opening up trading tomorrow… I already know this thing is ripping crazy once trading opens up the demand is probably ridiculous. 😂 https://t.co/7vIOFj4QhH
-41.2%vs sector
Exhibit E · 2026-01-17 ETH-USD
“I now own some Ethereum $ETH. I am a believer in the long-term stablecoin/tokenization thesis.”
Long · high conviction · View on X ↗
Full post
I now own some Ethereum $ETH. I am a believer in the long-term stablecoin/tokenization thesis. --- Track my live portfolio for free on Blossom Social (download using this link): https://t.co/apWzvqfTUs
-38.8%vs sector
Exhibit F · 2026-01-15 HOOD
“if Robinhood $HOOD shares got to the $70s or $80s I am a buyer. I stand by that statement.”
Long · high conviction · View on X ↗
Full post
I’ve made it clear in the past that if Robinhood $HOOD shares got to the $70s or $80s I am a buyer. I stand by that statement.
-25.0%vs sector

Their strongest setups — best combination at each horizon

  • 1 day long analysis posts +0.2% vs -0.2% overall · 136 bets
  • 1 month long sarcasm +2.4% vs -0.1% overall · 6 bets
  • 3 months short predictions +6.7% vs -2.4% overall · 12 bets

Step behind the counter — every call, every chart, every time horizon. Filter by conviction or direction and chart any single trade.

Open the data room →
THE RECEIPTS
@DudeWhoInvests · audited 1 Jul 2026

calls found1,156
independent bets443
beat the market47%
avg edge / month-0.3%
best callETH-USD +31.6%
worst callFIG -41.2%

VERDICT: INCONCLUSIVE
SCORE 1/10

Watch out for
their long sarcasm · +2.4% after 1 month

getxanalysis.net · run the receipts on anyone
Share the receipts on X ↗ Download all calls (CSV) ↓

Help shape XAnalytics

Was this report useful?

How we measured this · download the raw data

We pull @DudeWhoInvests's posts, use AI to extract each call (ticker, direction, conviction), and backtest it against real prices. A call wins only if it beat its own sector over the month after — not just if the stock rose. Headline numbers use deduplicated bets.

Download the full backtest data (JSONL)

Backtested results are computed from historical price data and do not predict future performance. Every signal here is extracted automatically from public posts and may misread intent, sarcasm, or context. This is not investment advice — verify everything independently before acting on it.