XAnalytics · Backtest audit File @RJCcapital · 28 Jun 2026

@RJCcapital · 857 verified calls backtested

@RJCcapital's calls have beaten their sector by 4.2% per month, winning 51% of the time.

+4.2%
Avg. return vs its sector
per call · over the timeframe it called (or 1 month)
+0.3%
1 day
+4.3%
1 month
+15.8%
3 months
the same calls held a fixed 1 day / 1 month / 3 months
51%
Calls that beat the market
based on 272 deduplicated bets
51% beat their sector 49% didn't

Their calls have genuinely beaten the market.

What “return vs sector” means
Each call's stock vs its own sector — beating the sector, not just going up, is the fair test of skill. Averaged across 272 deduplicated bets. Calls that named their own timeframe are judged over that window (as a per-month rate); the rest over 1 month.
Unlikely to be luck

Across 272 bets, @RJCcapital's average call beat its sector by 4.2% per month, each bet judged on its author's own timeframe (1 month when unstated, or as far into it as the data reaches) — t = 2.6, unlikely to be luck.

could be luckt = 2almost certain

t = 2.6 — the strength of the evidence. Above 2, there's under a 5% chance it's luck.

How the t-value works

Each call is one bet, scored by how much it beat its own sector (fairer than the whole market). The t-value is the average beat divided by its uncertainty:

t = x̄ ⁄ ( s ⁄ √M ) x̄ = avg beat · s = how much the bets vary · M = number of bets

Same-week, same-sector calls ride one move, so they prove less than fully independent wins — the 272 bets count as 220 effective ones. That's why the honest t is 2.6, not the raw 2.9. Full breakdown on the analysis page.

Performance over time

Aftervs sectorvs S&P 500Hit rateCalls
1 day +0.3% +0.2% 50% 305
1 month +4.3% +4.9% 49% 266
3 months +15.8% +19.9% 52% 266
6 months +31.3% +35.9% 54% 180
1 year +26.8% +27.4% 42% 31

“vs sector” compares each call to the stock's own industry — the fairest test of skill.

What drives the signal

Does conviction matter?

High conviction668 calls · 45% hit
+3.8%
Low conviction101 calls · 51% hit
+3.1%

Return by post type

News Reaction119 calls · 55% hit
+9.7%
Position Disclosure42 calls · 60% hit
+9.5%
Prediction390 calls · 46% hit
+3.3%
Analysis216 calls · 38% hit
+0.2%

Long vs short

Long732 calls · 46% hit
+4.1%
Short37 calls · 43% hit
-3.4%

The evidence — best & worst calls

Biggest wins (after 1 month)

Exhibit A · 2025-09-09 FLNC
“Long $flnc”
Long · low conviction · View on X ↗
Full post
@elonmusk Long $flnc
+116.9%vs sector
Exhibit B · 2025-09-04 NBIS
“all of this combined is trading at under $15B market cap $NBIS”
Long · low conviction · View on X ↗
Full post
Just a friendly reminder that all of this combined is trading at under $15B market cap $NBIS https://t.co/kEA26SJGWB
+88.9%vs sector
Exhibit C · 2025-12-19 IREN
“I am officially a proud $IREN bull”
Long · high conviction · View on X ↗
The post they were quoting
I am officially a proud $IREN bull https://t.co/AlNAp2lnld
+45.2%vs sector

Biggest misses (after 1 month)

Exhibit D · 2026-02-10 HIMS
“It trades at that level because it's going bankrupt. The novo lawsuit allows treble damages potentially exceeding the entire value of the equity and 6x availabl…”
Short · high conviction · View on X ↗
Full post
@danielisdizzy It trades at that level because it’s going bankrupt. The novo lawsuit allows treble damages potentially exceeding the entire value of the equity and 6x available cash on hand. It pains me to see such level of stupidity on this platform
-52.4%vs sector
Exhibit E · 2025-10-10 UAMY
“If you don't have an allocation to such a company you need to get on board in my opinion. I have 2.5% allocation.”
Long · high conviction · View on X ↗
Full post
RARE EARTH STOCKS RISE ON TRUMP CHINA TWEET. If you don’t have an allocation to such a company you need to get on board in my opinion. I have 2.5% allocation. $NAK $UAMY
-36.9%vs sector
Exhibit F · 2025-10-15 NBIS
“I am 50x levered long on $NBIS”
Long · high conviction · View on X ↗
Full post
@sam_badawi I am 50x levered long on $NBIS
-29.6%vs sector

Their strongest setups — best combination at each horizon

  • 1 day long sarcasm +2.9% vs +0.3% overall · 3 bets
  • 1 month long position disclosures +19.7% vs +4.3% overall · 10 bets
  • 3 months long position disclosures +30.0% vs +15.8% overall · 10 bets

Step behind the counter — every call, every chart, every time horizon. Filter by conviction or direction and chart any single trade.

Open the data room →
THE RECEIPTS
@RJCcapital · audited 28 Jun 2026

calls found857
independent bets272
beat the market51%
avg edge / month+4.2%
best callFLNC +116.9%
worst callHIMS -52.4%

VERDICT: WORTH FOLLOWING
SCORE 8/10

Watch out for
their long position disclosures · +19.7% after 1 month

getxanalysis.net · run the receipts on anyone
Share the receipts on X ↗ Download all calls (CSV) ↓

Help shape XAnalytics

Was this report useful?

How we measured this · download the raw data

We pull @RJCcapital's posts, use AI to extract each call (ticker, direction, conviction), and backtest it against real prices. A call wins only if it beat its own sector over the month after — not just if the stock rose. Headline numbers use deduplicated bets.

Download the full backtest data (JSONL)

Backtested results are computed from historical price data and do not predict future performance. Every signal here is extracted automatically from public posts and may misread intent, sarcasm, or context. This is not investment advice — verify everything independently before acting on it.