XAnalytics · Backtest audit File @bubbleboi · 28 Jun 2026

@bubbleboi · 400 verified calls backtested

@bubbleboi's calls have beaten their sector by 3.9% per month, winning 53% of the time.

+3.9%
Avg. return vs its sector
per call · over the timeframe it called (or 1 month)
+1.1%
1 day
+3.4%
1 month
+8.9%
3 months
the same calls held a fixed 1 day / 1 month / 3 months
53%
Calls that beat the market
based on 203 deduplicated bets
53% beat their sector 47% didn't

Their calls have genuinely beaten the market.

What “return vs sector” means
Each call's stock vs its own sector — beating the sector, not just going up, is the fair test of skill. Averaged across 203 deduplicated bets. Calls that named their own timeframe are judged over that window (as a per-month rate); the rest over 1 month.
Unlikely to be luck

Across 203 bets, @bubbleboi's average call beat its sector by 3.9% per month, each bet judged on its author's own timeframe (1 month when unstated, or as far into it as the data reaches) — t = 2.4, unlikely to be luck.

could be luckt = 2almost certain

t = 2.4 — the strength of the evidence. Above 2, there's under a 5% chance it's luck.

How the t-value works

Each call is one bet, scored by how much it beat its own sector (fairer than the whole market). The t-value is the average beat divided by its uncertainty:

t = x̄ ⁄ ( s ⁄ √M ) x̄ = avg beat · s = how much the bets vary · M = number of bets

Same-week, same-sector calls ride one move, so they prove less than fully independent wins — the 203 bets count as 171 effective ones. That's why the honest t is 2.4, not the raw 2.6. Full breakdown on the analysis page.

Performance over time

Aftervs sectorvs S&P 500Hit rateCalls
1 day +1.1% +0.8% 55% 233
1 month +3.4% +4.5% 52% 203
3 months +8.9% +10.1% 52% 155
6 months +32.2% +36.6% 59% 95
1 year +6.2% +6.9% 51% 53

“vs sector” compares each call to the stock's own industry — the fairest test of skill.

What drives the signal

Does conviction matter?

High conviction276 calls · 58% hit
+5.2%
Low conviction62 calls · 52% hit
+3.7%

Return by post type

News Reaction5 calls · 60% hit
+15.9%
Position Disclosure45 calls · 64% hit
+7.6%
Analysis69 calls · 57% hit
+7.1%
Prediction216 calls · 56% hit
+3.6%

Long vs short

Long230 calls · 57% hit
+7.5%
Short108 calls · 57% hit
-0.6%

The evidence — best & worst calls

Biggest wins (after 1 month)

Exhibit A · 2025-01-19 MELANIA-USD
“Shorting $MELANIA token”
Short · low conviction · View on X ↗
Full post
Shorting $MELANIA token, no good economic sense coming from a Slovenian im sorry.
+91.3%vs sector
Exhibit B · 2026-01-09 SG
“SHORT Sloppy - Sweetgreen”
Short · high conviction · View on X ↗
Full post
No.. this is the market is pricing in the effect of Ozempic drugs being widespread, cheap, and administered orally. This is a huge secular trend. I’m calling it the Girl Dinner trade. Long sexy clothing, cosmetics, & filler. Short liquid desert and fast casual salad bowl slop! Look at the past 6 months. --- BUBBLE CAPITAL LONG Sexy - Victoria Secret, Revolve Group, Galderma SHORT Sloppy - Sweetgreen, Cava, Starbucks
+26.0%vs sector
Exhibit C · 2026-05-18 AMAT
“Leo Applied Materials is the better long, trust me”
Long · high conviction · View on X ↗
Full post
Leopold’s 13F is showing exactly what I’ve been saying… July is the peak of the cycle! The TSMC puts & ASML long is all you need to know! But Leo Applied Materials is the better long, trust me leooooooooooo!
+24.8%vs sector

Biggest misses (after 1 month)

Exhibit D · 2026-04-05 AAOI
“These are all going to collapse next year.”
Short · high conviction · View on X ↗
-58.2%vs sector
Exhibit E · 2025-09-28 AMD
“There is no company on earth I am more bearish on than AMD. No vision, no direction, just straight up if "where's my hug?" was a company.”
Short · high conviction · View on X ↗
Full post
There is no company on earth I am more bearish on than AMD. No vision, no direction, just straight up if “where’s my hug?” was a company.
-47.4%vs sector
Exhibit F · 2026-04-16 Kioxia
“I would short Kioxia with bad balance sheet”
Short · high conviction · View on X ↗
Full post
@strictrope No. I would short micron they are an HBM loser and I would short Kioxia with bad balance sheet.
-46.2%vs sector

Their strongest setups — best combination at each horizon

  • 1 day short predictions +1.5% vs +1.1% overall · 68 bets
  • 1 month long position disclosures +14.7% vs +3.4% overall · 16 bets
  • 3 months long position disclosures +44.0% vs +8.9% overall · 14 bets

Step behind the counter — every call, every chart, every time horizon. Filter by conviction or direction and chart any single trade.

Open the data room →
THE RECEIPTS
@bubbleboi · audited 28 Jun 2026

calls found400
independent bets203
beat the market53%
avg edge / month+3.9%
best callMELANIA-USD +91.3%
worst callAAOI -58.2%

VERDICT: WORTH FOLLOWING
SCORE 8/10

Watch out for
their long position disclosures · +14.7% after 1 month

getxanalysis.net · run the receipts on anyone
Share the receipts on X ↗ Download all calls (CSV) ↓

Help shape XAnalytics

Was this report useful?

How we measured this · download the raw data

We pull @bubbleboi's posts, use AI to extract each call (ticker, direction, conviction), and backtest it against real prices. A call wins only if it beat its own sector over the month after — not just if the stock rose. Headline numbers use deduplicated bets.

Download the full backtest data (JSONL)

Backtested results are computed from historical price data and do not predict future performance. Every signal here is extracted automatically from public posts and may misread intent, sarcasm, or context. This is not investment advice — verify everything independently before acting on it.